Showing posts with label Shages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shages. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Diane Shages says "if ye ask, ye shall be answered"


During a recent school visit, I was asked by one of the visiting teachers whether or not Shakespeare was involved in the writing of the King James version of the Bible. Thank you to all docents who responded. I had similar information from several of you, but I think most of what you all told me is included in the following from Georgianna, Gerry and Bill.


From Georgianna Ziegler: Yes, these are apocryphal stories that have made the rounds about Shakespeare. (We’ve had people ask before.) The King James Bible was translated by a committee of scholars from Oxford and Cambridge, many of them linguists, and was obviously influenced by earlier translations such as that of Tyndale. See for example, David Daniell, The Bible in English (Yale UP, 2003).


Shakespeare's own vocabulary was much larger than that used in the Bible. According to Norrie Epstein's The Friendly Shakespeare, "It's estimated that Shakespeare used between 25,000 and 29,000 different words in his plays and poems. Consider that the King James Bible is made up of only six thousand different words." And, "One out of every dozen or so words was a new one that Shakespeare would never repeat in any play or poem" (p.224). Michael Macrone in his book Brush Up Your Shakespeare gives 9+ pages, double-columned, of words for which Shakespeare is listed as the first usage (pp.193 ff).


The reference to the cryptogram in the 46th Psalm is explained in Norrie Epstein's book, The Friendly Shakespeare, pp.298, 100.


From Gerry Connolly: Many believe he did only due to the fact that the writing in the King James Bible mirrors the musical writing of Shakespeare, but William Shakespeare is not credited as one of the 40-plus translators and writers. However, it is widely believed he did in fact assist a bit on the translation and writing, but his contribution would have been so minor he was left uncredited.


An interesting side-note is the fact that Shakespeare was 46 years old when the King James Bible was being translated and written, and the 46th word in Psalm 46 is "shake", and the 46th word from the end is "spear". This may be another reason so many believe he was involved in the translation and writing, especially on Psalm 46. If you want to count words then take a look at Psalm 46...


God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. Selah. There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High. God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early. The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted. The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah. Come, behold the works of the LORD, what desolations he hath made in the earth. He maketh wars to cease unto the end of the earth; he breaketh the bow, and cutteth the spear in sunder; he burneth the chariot in the fire. Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth. The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.


Most scholars dismiss claims of Shakespeare's involvement in translating the King James Version, and do not accept this example as evidence of his involvement. Notably, the Geneva Bible and several other earlier translations contained the same coincidence, despite several of them being published before or just shortly after Shakespeare's birth.[2]

Two of the most important influences on the English language were the King James Version of the Bible and the plays of William Shakespeare. These works helped standardize the language and make it what it is today. Given their importance to our language, it is not surprising that they also had an influence on each other. One would think that perhaps the King James Version of the Bible influenced Shakespeare, but this is not so. If Shakespeare wrote any plays after the KJV Bible was published in 1611, they were few and relatively unimportant. Further, it is unlikely that he wrote anything after 1613.


And from Bill Stewart: I refer you to "God's Secretaries" by Adam Nicolson--a recent and quite definitive book about the making of the King James Bible. There is no mention of Shakespeare having been part of this process.

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Digital Docent Dispatch from Diane Shages and Caitlin

Well, Docents, the printed and emailed Docent Dispatch is the last as we have known it.

Now that Caitlin has set up this Docent Blog and has trained at least some of us in accessing it (and is willing to teach others), the Docent Board has decided it is time to GO GREEN! Many of us will miss opening our mailboxes to find the Dispatch and holding it in our hands. However, there are some positives to this: information will be more current than has often been the case in the past, and we don’t need to worry about losing track of the paper Dispatch because the contents will always be available on the Blog.

Further, JC will continue to send out the monthly Calendar with other tidbits of useful information. For the Docents who do not have computers, we hope this will keep you in the loop. Also, we will continue to call those Docents who are not on the computer with important information which might not make the Calendar.

The next training session will take place in January. Stay tuned for details.